Working with Montana Modern Homes was amazing. They got a job done faster then anticipated, did a great job, and gave me a fantastic price. They perform all construction functions and it gives them a comprehensive view of the jobs they perform. Great value with these guys, highly recommend!
Rick and the team at Montana Modern Homes are top notch! They create high quality work all the way around, are easy to communicate with throughout the process, and provide stunningly beautiful work. Having worked with them on several properties and transactions I highly recommend Montana Modern Homes for any home project.
We love our new home by Montana Modern Homes. Rick and Norm were great to work with and the quality of the work they do is outstanding. We would not hesitate to recommend them to anyone.
Thanks for replying to "Duty to Warn". I was apart of this experience. Because space is limited here, this is in response to your reply to "Duty to Warn". It appears you flat out fabricated each point of your reply and fortunately we have all documents pertaining to this experience to back up our side.
You stated: It is unfortunate that we were not able to have a more significant dialogue as you believed we could have come to an agreement that was fair to all parties. You said, However, we were sent the inspection termination of contract immediately following the appraisal, which showed that the house was valued appropriately (>$50k higher than your initial offer) - an appraisal that we verbally agreed would be paid by you (but wasn’t) if the house appraised for the agreed upon price.
1. You did not agree to fix all of the issues...your realtor verbally agreed to them saying they wouldn't be a problem pn the 1/13, however, we never received anything in writing. For 5 days. Not immediately like you stated. The inspection notice was sent 1/13 and we terminated on 1/17. We would never agree to have your own inspector follow-up an impartial inspectors findings, why would you? We were interested in working out the details, however, after several days of "I think he's out of town" from your realtor, coupled with the Professional Structural Engineers assessment, it made sense to move on. Which we fortunately did, found a great home and have a close date set.
I would hope you and your realtor know better than to make any "verbal agreements". This is why everything we agreed to, was and is still in writing. In the buy-sell you stated, in writing, that you would pay for the appraisal because we were skeptical of your asking price. It stipulated that if it came in lower, both parties would be able to negotiate or walk and if it came in higher, the same. Simple. And the appraisal came in under your asking price still. There was never an agreement that we would pay the appraisal.
2. You stated this house passed all county inspections and received the certificate of occupancy. Also, that All of the issues detailed in the inspection report have been reviewed corrected where applicable
REPLY: A Professional Structural Engineer noted that the work you did was far from completed and unsafe to live from the inspection report. (carbon monoxide from the hot water heater being on the ground, no bracing used, covered up vets, etc..). Hopefully, you do get these repaired or already have. I'm sure any future inspections will find these issues if not.
3. We never said the lot was purposefully misrepresented. Just that if you want to fully utilize the 10,000+ sq ft lot you advertised, one would need to be playing in the street since that's where about 1500-2000 sq ft reside.
You said: The lot measurement is done using standard practices by surveyors when the subdivision was originally developed. You’ll find that the county GIS plat map shows the boundary lines including easements, encumbrances, etc. While we always recommend a buyer verify all square footage - both lot and improvements - to their satisfaction, the square footage of the lot was not purposely misrepresented in any way.
4. You said: It is unfortunate that we were not able to have a more significant dialogue as we believe we could have come to an agreement that was fair to all parties. However, we were sent the inspection termination of contract immediately following the appraisal, which showed that the house was valued appropriately (>$50k higher than your initial offer) - an appraisal that we verbally agreed would be paid by you (but wasn’t) if the house appraised for the agreed upon price.
In summary, we are putting this out on the web because we don't think you have the moral compass to disclose those findings and/or leave the problems for someone else to miss and subsequently, potentially find themselves in an unsafe home. We do this in confidence as we have substantial supporting documents for every claim stated.
God's bless. Do the right thing.
0
Working with Montana Modern Homes was amazing. They got a job done faster then anticipated, did a great job, and gave me a fantastic price. They perform all construction functions and it gives them a comprehensive view of the jobs they perform. Great value with these guys, highly recommend!
5 years ago0
Rick and the team at Montana Modern Homes are top notch! They create high quality work all the way around, are easy to communicate with throughout the process, and provide stunningly beautiful work. Having worked with them on several properties and transactions I highly recommend Montana Modern Homes for any home project.
4 years ago0
We love our new home by Montana Modern Homes. Rick and Norm were great to work with and the quality of the work they do is outstanding. We would not hesitate to recommend them to anyone.
5 years ago0
Thanks for replying to "Duty to Warn". I was apart of this experience. Because space is limited here, this is in response to your reply to "Duty to Warn". It appears you flat out fabricated each point of your reply and fortunately we have all documents pertaining to this experience to back up our side. You stated: It is unfortunate that we were not able to have a more significant dialogue as you believed we could have come to an agreement that was fair to all parties. You said, However, we were sent the inspection termination of contract immediately following the appraisal, which showed that the house was valued appropriately (>$50k higher than your initial offer) - an appraisal that we verbally agreed would be paid by you (but wasn’t) if the house appraised for the agreed upon price. 1. You did not agree to fix all of the issues...your realtor verbally agreed to them saying they wouldn't be a problem pn the 1/13, however, we never received anything in writing. For 5 days. Not immediately like you stated. The inspection notice was sent 1/13 and we terminated on 1/17. We would never agree to have your own inspector follow-up an impartial inspectors findings, why would you? We were interested in working out the details, however, after several days of "I think he's out of town" from your realtor, coupled with the Professional Structural Engineers assessment, it made sense to move on. Which we fortunately did, found a great home and have a close date set. I would hope you and your realtor know better than to make any "verbal agreements". This is why everything we agreed to, was and is still in writing. In the buy-sell you stated, in writing, that you would pay for the appraisal because we were skeptical of your asking price. It stipulated that if it came in lower, both parties would be able to negotiate or walk and if it came in higher, the same. Simple. And the appraisal came in under your asking price still. There was never an agreement that we would pay the appraisal. 2. You stated this house passed all county inspections and received the certificate of occupancy. Also, that All of the issues detailed in the inspection report have been reviewed corrected where applicable REPLY: A Professional Structural Engineer noted that the work you did was far from completed and unsafe to live from the inspection report. (carbon monoxide from the hot water heater being on the ground, no bracing used, covered up vets, etc..). Hopefully, you do get these repaired or already have. I'm sure any future inspections will find these issues if not. 3. We never said the lot was purposefully misrepresented. Just that if you want to fully utilize the 10,000+ sq ft lot you advertised, one would need to be playing in the street since that's where about 1500-2000 sq ft reside. You said: The lot measurement is done using standard practices by surveyors when the subdivision was originally developed. You’ll find that the county GIS plat map shows the boundary lines including easements, encumbrances, etc. While we always recommend a buyer verify all square footage - both lot and improvements - to their satisfaction, the square footage of the lot was not purposely misrepresented in any way. 4. You said: It is unfortunate that we were not able to have a more significant dialogue as we believe we could have come to an agreement that was fair to all parties. However, we were sent the inspection termination of contract immediately following the appraisal, which showed that the house was valued appropriately (>$50k higher than your initial offer) - an appraisal that we verbally agreed would be paid by you (but wasn’t) if the house appraised for the agreed upon price. In summary, we are putting this out on the web because we don't think you have the moral compass to disclose those findings and/or leave the problems for someone else to miss and subsequently, potentially find themselves in an unsafe home. We do this in confidence as we have substantial supporting documents for every claim stated. God's bless. Do the right thing.
4 years ago0
One of their drivers almost just nailed me on the I5 near lacey, flipped me off, then took the carpool lane illegally
a year ago